Litvek: лучшие книги недели
Топ книга - Думай как математик [Барбара Оакли] - читаем полностью в LitvekТоп книга - Кафе на краю земли. Как перестать плыть по течению и вспомнить, зачем ты живешь [Джон Стрелеки] - читаем полностью в LitvekТоп книга - НИ СЫ. Восточная мудрость, которая гласит: будь уверен в своих силах и не позволяй сомнениям мешать тебе двигаться вперед [Джен Синсеро] - читаем полностью в Litvek
Litvek - онлайн библиотека >> Екатерина Петровна Русакова и др. >> Экономика >> Digital Technologies as a Driver of Intellectual Stratification of Human Resources: Socio-Economic Inequality >> страница 2
world’s population;

— average level — more than one-third of the world’s population, including large countries, such as China and Indonesia, as well as small countries — Jamaica, the Maldives;

— low level — one-third of the world’s population, including 46 countries, 31 of which are African countries [10].


Table II. Groups of countries by the ICT development level based on Orbicom's Infostate index

Digital Technologies as a Driver of Intellectual Stratification of Human Resources: Socio-Economic Inequality. Иллюстрация № 4
Digital Technologies as a Driver of Intellectual Stratification of Human Resources: Socio-Economic Inequality. Иллюстрация № 5 Source: [10].


It can be said that one of the challenges of modern society is growing digital inequality, or digital gap, which leads to considerable geospatial disproportions in socio-economic development — digital asymmetry of the microsystem. An increase in the digital gap between the world’s regions means that part of the world community is not able to fully use the advantages of ICT resources. Hence, the level of their innovative activity is lower; accordingly, their economic potential is also low. Today, it is important to understand, which forces have accelerated the implementation of ICT. For this purpose, it is necessary to develop a policy aimed at eliminating the obstacles to the introduction of ICT in each individual region, country and even city. Despite the obvious leadership of highly developed countries, the global gap is gradually narrowing due to the dynamic development of such countries as the UAE, Macedonia, Bahrain, Vietnam, Nigeria, Greece and Cape Verde. At the same time, overcoming digital inequality would contribute to the economic growth and integration of backward countries, raising the level of educational, medical, managerial and other services and providing the active attraction of investments and, consequently, the complex-proportional development of the microsystem.

Rapid changes in the level of computer capability, reduction in prices for silicon chips and electronics, as well as achievements in the area of wireless connection have made powerful technologies accessible in many parts of the world, which used to lag behind in terms of technology application. This allows developing countries to obtain significant advantages by joining the information society, especially if a country is focused on raising the level of its readiness for digital transformations. Thus, developing countries enrich themselves by participating in the global digital network gaining the ability to use digital goods and add “value” to the whole community. Obviously, readiness for such changes is increasingly important for the developing world. This readiness creates new opportunities for companies and individuals, erases barriers, which previously presented an obstacle on the way to information, goods and services, and promotes the improvement of cultural, social and political well-being. Among new opportunities offered to countries willing to raise the level of their readiness for digital transformations, one can mention the opportunity for application and development of new forms of business, expansion of access to the global market of goods and services, open access to any information for each member of society, overcoming of physical and virtual isolation, awareness of society members in the area of government policy and economic, social and cultural processes of the country or region and the world as a whole, increase in the level of education, medicine, etc.

Recently, many countries have shifted the focus from the issue of access to ICT to the problem of more effective ICT use in order to promote business innovation and increase management effectiveness and social cohesion. In particular, according to the conclusion of the World Economic Forum, the successful use of ICT is facilitated by the shared environment for ICT, including market conditions and regulatory climate. Such network readiness requires efforts of the entire society, including respective actions on behalf of the population, business and government. At the same time, the readiness to use ICT by all interested parties increases their effectiveness in day-to-day activities. Connection of the population, business and government to the Internet has become an increasingly important factor, as the role of the Internet is growing. The intensive use of the Internet requires high-quality broadband access, as well as fixed and wireless networks.

Governments of many countries invest funds in the construction of digital pipes — national high-speed broadband access based on a combination of fixed and wireless networks — as they accelerate their countries’ socio-economic development.

V. CONCLUSION
ICT has become an integral part of life and has a direct influence on people’s activities, the development of the microsystem as a whole and each individual in particular. However, despite the overall high level and positive dynamics, the main distinctions in the sphere of ICT implementation in certain regions and countries are brought to light. Today, IT is viewed as the main driving force, but at the same time, this force is sometimes seen as a threat of widening the gap between technologically rich and technologically poor countries. Thus, according to the majority of researchers, the modern world is divided not ideologically but technologically: the higher the technological capacities of some countries, the more other countries lag behind them.

REFERENCES
1. A.N. Semyonova, and V.A. Stupkina, “Digital Technologies in Human Resource Management”. Young Scientist, vol. 4, 2019, pp. 250–252.

2. M. Rozin, ECOPSY Consulting. "Six HR trends in 2018". Available: http://www.ecopsy.ru/publikatsii/ru-shest-hr-trendov-2018-goda.html

3. T. Aleshkina, and Y. Yarosh, “Sberbank is essentially an IT company.” RBC. 2015. Available: http://www.rbc.ru/newspaper/2015/06/24/56bcc4ea9a7947299f72beb0

4. N. Albrecht, “The Five Rules of Digital”. Report at the 17th Summit of HR-Directors of Russia and the CIS on 6-07.10.2016. Available: https://www.hrsummit.ru/ru/konferentsiy

5. A. Balashov, and R. Rozhkov, “The office is temporarily unavailable”. Newspaper Kommersant. 2016. Available: http://kommersant.ru/doc/3023556

6. A. Belaichuk, “Digital revolution: your business cannot survive without the Internet”. Executive.ru. 2015. Available: http://www.executive.ru/management/marketing/1982777-tsifrovoi-perevorot-bez-internetavashemu-biznesu-ne-vyzhit

7. D. Bulin, “Gref: Russia needs a new management system”. BBC Russian Service. 2016. Available: http://www.bbc.com/russian/business/2016/05/160522_gref_skolkovo_ lecture

8. “International Research Company Gartner”. 2016. Available: http://www.gartner.com/

9. E. Hargittai, “The Digital Divide and what to do about it”. San Diego: Academic Press, 2003.

10. “Measuring the Information Society”. 2010. Available: http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/publications/idi/2010/index.html

11. C.P. Chandrasekhar, “How Global is the IT Industry?” Political Affairs. 2006. http://www.politicalaffairs.net/article/articleview/4276/1/216